X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:56:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.121.222.243] (HELO agcsrvr.AGCEngineering.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.7) with ESMTP id 3119958 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:37:45 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.121.222.243; envelope-from=JohnB@agcheattransfer.com X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-Ninja-AttachmentFiltering: (no action) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C911EA.4CDF67BE" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: My three Birdstrikes X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:37:08 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <21105FE689C16E45BFCD702D4D921DCA0BC32B@agcsrvr.AGCEngineering.com> In-Reply-To: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: My three Birdstrikes thread-index: AckR6WByJGM+sjoiSkGZePia9L7KtwAAKQhA References: From: "John C. Bohn" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C911EA.4CDF67BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott,=20 In your opinion (highly valued due to the three hits) what would the bird strike have done to the wing if it struck it....also, was it "tweety" or something more substantial? =20 John C. Bohn Lancair 4P- N28487,=20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Scott Resnick Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:30 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: My three Birdstrikes =20 I have hit three birds so far in Lancairs. One on Takeoff at Night. 120knts Broke the spinner. One at 8,000 feet over the Columbia River in Oregon. 170 knts Cracked the Cowl One on Extended Base 140 knts =20 Cracked the Cowl . Birds love me.=20 Scott --- On Sun, 9/7/08, MikeEasley@aol.com wrote: From: MikeEasley@aol.com Subject: [LML] Re: high speed passes and go arounds To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008, 3:09 PM One argument I've heard concerning high speed passes is the potential= of a bird strike. At high speed the impact of a bird is much more dangerous than if it happens at approach speeds. I'm not sure how valid the argument is, but it makes sense to me. =20 Mike Easley Colorado Springs ________________________________ Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com . =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C911EA.4CDF67BE Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Scott,

In your opinion (highly valued due= to the three hits) what would the bird strike have done to the wing if it struc= k it….also, was it “tweety” or something more substantial?

 

John C. Bohn Lancair 4P- N28487,

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironl= ine.net] On Behalf Of Scott Resnick
Sent: Monday, September= 08, 2008 2:30 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net=
Subject: [LML] Re: My thr= ee Birdstrikes

 

I have hit three birds so far in Lancairs.<= br>
One on Takeoff at Night.  120knts
Broke the spinner.

One at 8,000 feet over the Columbia River in Oregon. 170 knts
Cracked the Cowl

One on Extended Base  140 knts 
Cracked the Cowl

.

Birds love me.


Scott




--- On Sun, 9/7/08, MikeEasley@aol= .com <MikeEasley@aol.com> wrote:

From: MikeEasley@aol.com <MikeEasley@aol.com>
Subject: [LML] Re: high speed passes and go arounds
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008, 3:09 PM

One argument= I've heard concerning high speed passes is the potential of a bird strike.&= nbsp; At high speed the impact of a bird is much more dangerous than if it= happens at approach speeds.  I'm not sure how valid the argument is, but= it makes sense to me.

 

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C911EA.4CDF67BE--