X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.7) with ESMTP id 3116977 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:09:51 -0400 Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r10.8.) id q.c6a.3ba7b99b (29672) for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 08:09:49 -0400 (EDT) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 08:09:49 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: high speed passes and go arounds X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1220702989" X-Mailer: Unknown sub 34 X-Spam-Flag:NO -------------------------------1220702989 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit One argument I've heard concerning high speed passes is the potential of a bird strike. At high speed the impact of a bird is much more dangerous than if it happens at approach speeds. I'm not sure how valid the argument is, but it makes sense to me. Mike Easley Colorado Springs **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) -------------------------------1220702989 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One argument I've heard concerning high speed passes is the potential o= f a=20 bird strike.  At high speed the impact of a bird is much more dangerous= =20 than if it happens at approach speeds.  I'm not sure how valid the argu= ment=20 is, but it makes sense to me.
 
Mike Easley
Colorado Springs



<= /HTML> -------------------------------1220702989--