X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:37:59 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTP id 3062044 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:59:00 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.158.62.67; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com.int (wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com.int [192.168.8.242]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id BA70E1802276 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:54:23 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (208.36.123.229) by wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com; 5 Aug 2008 10:54:06 -0000 Received: by ws1-4a.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A2976CD80FB; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:54:23 +0000 (GMT) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_121793366354771" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ron Galbraith" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 06:54:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Clearing up some information about the Legacy accident. Received: from [204.108.8.5] by ws1-4a.us4.outblaze.com with http for cfi@instructor.net; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 06:54:23 -0400 X-Originating-Ip: 204.108.8.5 X-Originating-Server: ws1-4a.us4.outblaze.com X-Original-Message-Id: <20080805105423.A2976CD80FB@ws1-4a.us4.outblaze.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_121793366354771 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The throttle was in the full forward position too, indicating full power was being applied, but again might have been from impact. Adding full power could accelerate the snap roll. You are correct in your assesment; however another outside possibility would be wake turbulance. This is what the NTSB is sorting through and will release preliminary findings soon. Ron Galbraith "...upside down at about 45 degree angle" sure sounds like a full stall with a snap roll, just like mine would do if I didn't know how to recognize and recover from the situation before it turned so bad. What else could do it? -------------------------------------------------------------------- --_----------=_121793366354771 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
The throttle was in the full forward position too, indicating full power wa= s being applied, but again might have been from impact.  Adding full p= ower could accelerate the snap roll.  You are correct in your assesmen= t; however another outside possibility would be wake turbulance.  This= is what the NTSB is sorting through and will release preliminary findings = soon.

Ron Galbraith



"...upside do= wn at about 45 degree angle" sure sounds like a full stall with a snap roll= , just like mine would do if I didn't know how to recognize and recover fro= m the situation before it turned so bad. What else could do it?



--_----------=_121793366354771--