X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 08:39:42 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2892754@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <troneill@charter.net>
Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2)
  with ESMTP id 2892748 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 May 2008 08:31:10 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net
Received: from aarprv06.charter.net ([10.20.200.76]) by mta21.charter.net
          (InterMail vM.7.08.03.00 201-2186-126-20070710) with ESMTP
          id <20080504123023.XXAO23078.mta21.charter.net@aarprv06.charter.net>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 4 May 2008 08:30:23 -0400
Received: from axs ([75.132.241.174]) by aarprv06.charter.net with SMTP
          id <20080504123022.GWKD3194.aarprv06.charter.net@axs>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 4 May 2008 08:30:22 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <00ba01c8ade2$9f93d920$6501a8c0@axs>
From: "terrence o'neill" <troneill@charter.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2892434@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11)
X-Original-Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 07:30:22 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Chzlrs: 0

Randy,
lurking, with our 235/320, interested. The lml has m entioned the original 
235 gross of 1400 was raised to 1500 after the tests ... which tests?
I heard 9Gs somewhere, and also heard that the glass margin of safety is 
sometimes designed for Limit plus 100% instead of 50%...
Either way, it's comforting to hear the big G numbers, and will probably set 
our Limit at 4.4Gs and 1650.
I watched the G-meter a lot in Colorado X-country flightrs with big thermal 
bumps, and they always FELT a lot bigger than they registered on the 
meter...fwiw.
Terrence
N211AL
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <marv@lancair.net>
To: <lml>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11)


> Posted for randy snarr <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>:
>
>  Duane,
>  I heard that the original 235 wings were tested to dist ruction at the
> factory many years ago. If memory serves they failed around 11 g's or some
> ridiculous # like that.
>  So i'd  say you are safe to 10.5 g's...
>  Ok ok just kidding... but the first part is supposedly legit lore..
>  Stick to 4.4 utility and you should never come close to failing the
> structure...
>  Randy Snarr
>  235/320
>  N694RS
>  "McCune, Duane" <DMccune@csuchico.edu> wrote:
>
> --
> For archives and unsub 
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>