X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:49:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.206] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.1) with SMTP id 2813852 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:20:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 76296 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2008 02:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO paulrzm5oth3zt) (pbricker@att.net@76.206.248.200 with login) by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2008 02:20:24 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: CYdTI7kVM1nHxylC9O2EOOd9ry3RCanSJGnC9mhNb7WnikxT5eQ.duNiRyf8TfxXSFlJrG96Px0PKxdI3tUMaaHyuQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Paul Bricker" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Miracle Antenna/AirWhip X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:20:45 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <002701c88c8c$8166d7d0$6601a8c0@paulrzm5oth3zt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AciMhwo4dzzJRrqWQ42fBo1SkkRoDQAAbMsg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Angier, Let me start by saying I don't have any experience with the AirWhip = antenna. I am an electronics engineer (retired) and Ham.=20 If I read the AirWhip description correctly it appears to be a network = that end-feeds an antenna element that is the length of a dipole, eliminating = the need for a ground plane. I have no doubts that it does that, and the impedance match is good. That said, I see some issues. 1) The antenna needs to be oriented to match the polarization of the = signal it is attempting to receive or transmit. For VHF voice that is vertical polarization, and for VORs that is horizontal polarization.=20 2) The antenna length need to be 1/2 wavelength long to get the best = gain. That=92s about 54 inches for the bottom of the Nav band and 50 inches = for the bottom of the Comm band.=20 3) The antenna element needs to be close to straight to achieve maximum gain, so it shouldn't be wrapped inside the empennage (for instance). = While composite planes can usually find a 55 inch horz location of an antenna (wing, belly, etc.), and vertical location is more challenging. That's = why the Archer dipole antenna is usually bonded inside the vertical = stabilizer. It's the only location that supports the physics of the situation. On the positive side, the connection appears much more substantial than = the center feed for the Archer dipoles, and from that standpoint it could be = an improvement.=20 The site doesn't say what type of coax pigtail extends from the AirWhip. = If it's just RG-58, or some other single shield coax, the pigtail should be shortened, a new BNC installed, and the remainder of the run done using RG-400, or some other high quality 50-ohm double shielded cable. Hope this helps Paul Bricker N63PB -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Greenbacks, UnLtd. Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 6:40 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Miracle Antenna/AirWhip Is there anyone on the list with knowledge of, or experience with this =20 product? Looks interesting... http://www.miracleantenna.com/AirWhip.htm Angier Ames N4ZQ -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date: = 3/18/2008 8:10 AM =20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date: = 3/18/2008 8:10 AM =20