X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [161.88.255.139] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.2.0) with HTTP id 2786910 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:44 -0400 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: Re: [LML] FW: Spoilers for IVP To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.2.0 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:44 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8CA519FA34EA41E-1448-468C@FWM-D04.sysops.aol.com> References: <8CA519FA34EA41E-1448-468C@FWM-D04.sysops.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1;format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for vtailjeff@aol.com: John, Well you had to ask so here is my .02 cents. 1. Why reinvent the wheel? The electric speed brakes offered by Precise Flight work well and already are engineered into the design of the IVP. Unless, of course, you (like the rest of us) just like doodling in the shop. (BTW-- I have your carbinge hinges and they are great!) 2. How are you going to plumb the hydraulic lines? I imagine you will use the existing hydraulic system for hydraulic pressure. Three distinct disadvantages: ?????? a. it is bound to be heavier than the existing electric system ?????? b. it will likely result in an increase in the likelihood of a hydraulic failure. This?is not good. A hydraulic failure will probably result in a gear up landing. IMHO the hydraulic system has one purpose. Put the gear "up" and most importantly "down". Anything else results in a greater chance of that not occuring. ?????? c. I just pulled my wings off to rewire them for deice. I cannot imagine chasing a hydraulic leak in the wing. I applaud you for your inventive spirit. Best of luck! Jeff