Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:39:38 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2781829@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.64; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=Tt5G85ewVomfoZCyWcMx6qvn5HHUMIZNItNS+YHz6UyTtPXx3XqnTugCBwpI+St0;
  h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
References: <list-2781099@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Spoilers for IVP
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John,
    I have no specific expertise on the aero-dynamics or the hydraulics. 
but I did think about it when I had to choose between precise flight speed 
brakes and bill maddox speed brakes.  My conclusion was that you basically 
have two choices: a) guarantee that you have sufficient control authority to 
overcome unequal deployment b) mechanically guarantee that unequal 
deployment cannot occur.
     Precise flight has a sensor which de-energizes the system if there is 
split deployment.  If you are lucky, everything retracts.  This is not quite 
(b).
    However, on your system, since aerodynamic forces favor retraction, 
something like that might be a good direction.

Colyn