X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:49:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2717926 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:14:13 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.4; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.c2b.1ca07a52 (39330) for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:13:17 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:13:17 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Accepted Verbage for Annual Signoff X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1202321597" X-Mailer: Unknown sub 34 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1202321597 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit asw20747, My airworthiness certificate addendum "Operating Limitations" contains the text required for the annual condition inspection signoff: 'Inspections shall be recorded in the aircraft maintenance records showing the following or a similarly worded statement: "I certify that this aircraft has been inspected on in accordance with the scope and detail of part 43, Appendix D, or other FAA approved programs and found to be in a condition for safe operation." ' I eliminate the phrase ", or other FAA approved programs", thus the text I use is: "I certify that this aircraft has been inspected on in accordance with the scope and detail of part 43, Appendix D and found to be in a condition for safe operation." Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Pilot not TSO'd, Certificated score only > 70%. In a message dated 2/6/2008 11:29:05 A.M. Central Standard Time, asw20747@aol.com writes: Does anyone have the accepted wording for an experimental aircraft, annual condition signoff from a repairman/amateur aircraft builder. I can find in FAR Part 43 (subpart D) what NEEDS to be checked..... but nothing on HOW it should be signed off. **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025 48) -------------------------------1202321597 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
asw20747,
 
My airworthiness certificate addendum "Operating Limitations" cont= ains=20 the text required for the annual condition inspection signoff:
 
'Inspections shall be recorded in the aircraft maintenance records show= ing=20 the following or a similarly worded statement:  "I certify that this=20 aircraft has been inspected on <insert date> in accordance wi= th=20 the scope and detail of part 43, Appendix D, or other FAA approved programs=20= and=20 found to be in a condition for safe operation." '
 
I eliminate the phrase ", or other FAA approved programs", thus the tex= t I=20 use is:
 
"I certify that this aircraft has been inspected on <insert=20 date> in accordance with the scope and detail of part 43, Appendix D= and=20 found to be in a condition for safe operation."=20
 
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

Pil= ot=20 not TSO'd, Certificated score only > 70%.
 
In a message dated 2/6/2008 11:29:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 asw20747@aol.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Does=20 anyone have the accepted wording for an experimental aircraft, annual=20 condition signoff  from a repairman/amateur aircraft builder.

= I=20 can find in FAR Part 43 (subpart D) what NEEDS to be checked..... but noth= ing=20 on HOW it should be signed=20 off.




-------------------------------1202321597--