X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:23:38 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [216.200.145.38] (HELO omta12.mta.everyone.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2554393 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:47:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.200.145.38; envelope-from=bknotts@buckeye-express.com Received: from dm07.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta12.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C58A40247 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:46:34 -0800 (PST) X-Eon-Dm: dm07 Received: by dm07.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 48f14afd) id dm07.474f8520.24237a for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:46:33 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQK8DXBHVKNpYBh+VAIAAAAB,bd3d4c9c5b0873609a72e1cf8dfdfff7 X-Original-Message-ID: <4754A360.7070504@buckeye-express.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:46:24 -0500 From: "F. Barry Knotts" Reply-To: bknotts884@earthlink.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Legacy Stainless Steel Exhaust Tunnel Shields? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050701090400020806030301" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050701090400020806030301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Valin...I'm interested in the stainless steel exhaust tunnels...Unfortunately, I am fettered by being a builder of a IV-P. The tunnel of the Legacy and the tunnel of the IV-P look similar. Are they the same? That is, would the Legacy stainless steel tunnel liner fit the IV-P? Or, would the production run allow a IV-P sized and fitted unit instead of the Legacy unit? It might bring a few more willing souls to the table for the production run. I would be one. Barry Knotts L-IV P, Conti-TSIO-550, Perrysburg, Oh bknotts884@earthlink.net Valin & Allyson Thorn wrote: > > Hello Legacy Builders & Flyers, > > > > It looks like there's no better way to finish off the cowling/fuselage > engine exhaust tunnels than to use polished stainless steel pieces > that cover the thermal blanket and transition from firewall to > fuselage bottom. Yet, there's no ready source of .... > --------------050701090400020806030301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Valin...I'm interested in the stainless steel exhaust tunnels...Unfortunately, I am fettered by being a builder of a IV-P. The tunnel of the Legacy and the tunnel of the IV-P look similar. Are they the same? That is, would the Legacy stainless steel tunnel liner fit the IV-P? Or, would the production run allow a IV-P sized and fitted unit instead of the Legacy unit? It might bring a few more willing souls to the table for the production run. I would be one.

Barry Knotts
L-IV P, Conti-TSIO-550, Perrysburg, Oh
bknotts884@earthlink.net

Valin & Allyson Thorn wrote:

Hello Legacy Builders & Flyers,

It looks like there’s no better way to finish off the cowling/fuselage engine exhaust tunnels than to use polished stainless steel pieces that cover the thermal blanket and transition from firewall to fuselage bottom. Yet, there’s no ready source of ....

--------------050701090400020806030301--