X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:47:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.97.144.86] (HELO n126.sc0.he.tucows.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2132900 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:16:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.97.144.86; envelope-from=billhogarty@hughes.net Received: from [192.168.1.101] (69.19.84.131) by n126.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as billhogarty@hughes.net) id 4665FAA9002945D7 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:15:18 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <467B5AD2.1030406@hughes.net> X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:14:58 -0800 From: billhogarty User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Replacement Spring] L-IV Retractable Step References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For Craig Berland: Many thanks for the spring data. Now that I have a starting point, I should be able to locate a stronger replacement for the original Lancair spring. If anyone else is interested in trying a stronger spring, I will be happy to pick up a few extra. Let me know. After I locate a replacement spring and have some experience with it, I will report my findings. Thanks again Craig Regards, Bill Hogarty