X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:28:11 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2131936@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <blackoaks@gmail.com>
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10)
  with ESMTP id 2131877 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:11:39 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.236; envelope-from=blackoaks@gmail.com
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so546135wra
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Yt9OyPwob6UG8Rf62r7kjuQRcmFbRtLE/GJ+4AT4tWoTK1tndztRbEdP+eokIklpue0sp8gM4Sj4F3OipaQuwEfQWQ9i4wjuw1OzlzJ5l2pO5ejXgBD9gC8oWu3zm97Ui2SIQZwV9kZIqwZa0GQw/K3e81ZHQeosKF91vyTLTrE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=RcZfCyJR5TMsC7iuuLUmYfyD8LKBFtSYWPSxp2h81SnEAVP5nbLPM4z/EsAjRHT+FF5SLIoEYFOLtw0rHYCoqKKiyYFi3paZvqWeV1mD7els4bwOayup+8W/lz65BXuF+q1xjBMLraP9HF2vW0faUfu0QXinrgov5RBbgPSSCtk=
Received: by 10.78.193.5 with SMTP id q5mr1079299huf.1182445861626;
        Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.188.7 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <254321ea0706211011u4353bdb8nb2e23a60c6e29cd8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:11:01 -0700
From: "John McMahon" <blackoaks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Front Wheel Pant-Legacy Fixed Gear
In-Reply-To: <list-2131431@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_92474_5850771.1182445861525"
References: <list-2131431@logan.com>

------=_Part_92474_5850771.1182445861525
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Mike,  I'm trying to remember, do we know if anybody has had a shimmy
episode when the nose wheel pant was not installed??


On 6/21/07, MikeEasley@aol.com <MikeEasley@aol.com> wrote:
>
>  Bill,
>
> From discussions among the ES builders, it's a good idea to keep the wheel
> pant light.  Of course the ES is a much heavier aircraft, but the nosewheel
> is susceptible to shimmy.  And since the IVs have the same strut and don't
> appear to have the shimmy problems, we have concluded that the ES shimmy is
> due to the mass of the wheel pant.  I would grind out any unnecessary bulk
> and reduce the overall weight.
>
> Mike Easley
> Super ES
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503>.
>
>



-- 
John McMahon
Lancair Super ES, S/N 170, N9637M (Reserved)

------=_Part_92474_5850771.1182445861525
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Mike,&nbsp; I&#39;m trying to remember, do we know if anybody has had a shimmy episode when the nose wheel pant was <span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">not</span> installed??<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 6/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:MikeEasley@aol.com">MikeEasley@aol.com</a></b> &lt;<a href="mailto:MikeEasley@aol.com">MikeEasley@aol.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">




<div style="font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"><font color="#000000" face="Arial" size="2">
<div>Bill,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>From discussions among the ES builders, it&#39;s a good idea to keep the wheel 
pant light.&nbsp; Of course the ES is a much heavier aircraft, but the nosewheel 
is susceptible to shimmy.&nbsp; And since the IVs have the same strut and don&#39;t 
appear to have the shimmy problems, we have concluded that the ES shimmy is due 
to the mass of the wheel pant.&nbsp; I would grind out any unnecessary bulk and 
reduce the overall weight.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Mike Easley</div>
<div>Super ES</div></font><br><br><br><div><font style="color: black; font-family: ARIAL,SAN-SERIF; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;">
<hr style="margin-top: 10px;">See what&#39;s free at <a title="http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503" href="http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
AOL.com</a>. </font></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>John McMahon<br>Lancair Super ES, S/N 170, N9637M (Reserved)

------=_Part_92474_5850771.1182445861525--