X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:32:53 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2107083 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:31:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=rtitsworth@mindspring.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=riZxrElvDRx6l23oGkCMSCyER072I+8Civxgf62PgnveSoaR+Roi6zPelozR2pX6; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.40.94.44] (helo=RDTVAIO) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HzkXw-0002dp-KT for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:31:20 -0400 From: "rtitsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: SS Teflon Hoses vs SS Ruber hoses X-Original-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:31:15 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <000601c7b087$94a71580$6500a8c0@RDTVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcewKz3ICzYbF2geSYibYyKsd+iPJQAWUBMQ In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-ELNK-Trace: b17f11247b2ac8f0a79dc4b33984cbaa0a9da525759e2654607d19d6215acc14e6f4cddc8f1da2e1bd6355a4fd6b880e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.40.94.44 BACKGROUND: The factory supplied brake line hoses (for the gear leg segment) on my ES appear to be SS braided Teflon with a blue cotton (or similar) abrasion braid over the SS, and swaged ends. They are slightly too long (approx 1.5"). They'll work as-is, but the routing would be better if they were a bit shorter. ISSUE: While talking with an experienced A&P at my airport about finding someone to cut off one end and re-swage a new end on my existing brake line(s) to shorten them up a bit - He commented that I probably really didn't want the Teflon hoses anyway. He said, that since the Teflon liner is typically thinner than a standard SS rubber hose liner, that there is a risk of a broken SS braid wire piercing the Teflon and initiating a leak. (???) I had never heard of this and in fact thought that the SS Teflon hoses were pretty much superior to SS rubber hoses in all (nearly all) aspects, including longer (unlimited) service life. I was aware that the ID of a SS Teflon hose is typically slightly smaller than a similar sized SS rubber hose, but I thought the flow rates were similar due to the smoothness of the Teflon. I'm not sure the flow rate comparison really applies to brake lines anyway. Thoughts/comments on SS Teflon vs SS Rubber? Any confirmation of my A&P's comments above (or is it an OWT - old wise tale). Rick Titsworth