X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:32:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtai04.charter.net ([209.225.8.184] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2104558 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:22:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.8.184; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net Received: from aa04.charter.net ([10.20.200.156]) by mtai04.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070615152201.WFXW1555.mtai04.charter.net@aa04.charter.net> for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:22:01 -0400 Received: from axs ([75.132.198.100]) by aa04.charter.net with SMTP id <20070615152201.EESP3826.aa04.charter.net@axs> for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:22:01 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <003401c7af60$eea09110$6501a8c0@axs> From: "terrence o'neill" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Boost Pump X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:22:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Chzlrs: 0 Replying to Bill, referenced in Bob Mackey's e-mail note to Bill, below. Bill, I have a Dukes P/N 4140-00-15 (Cessna P/N C291504) Ser. No. 17689. I bought it new and used it about 45 hours on my Model W prototype, for a Lyc. IO-360-A1B, and then stored it until now. Yours for $500., no core charge. Placard says 35 g.p.h @ 23 psi. Price of rebuilts is $489. plus $400. core charge. Terrence O'Neill L235/320 N211AL ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob mackey" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 09:53 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Boost Pump > >> I'm looking at a Dukes pump that's rated 11.0 PSI low and 25 PSI >> on high. Flow rate is 35 GPM @ 21.0 PSI. I don't know how this >> compares to the pumps being used in Lancair installations, but >> wouldn't seem that the Dukes could overload the system, especially >> if the engine-driven pump was inoperative. >> If you were idling and hit the high boost, yes. At full TO power it >> should >> be less than the engine-driven output. My question is: could the output >> of >> the two pumps combine and overwhelm the return line causing pressure and >> thus fuel flow to go out of limits? > > Bill: > You might want to check those specs... you wrote that the > Dukes pump is rated at 35 GPM (gallons per MINUTE) > while the engine uses 32-36 GPH (gallons per HOUR). > > If you can really fill a 5 gallon can from the Dukes pump > in 8.57 seconds, it can probably flood an IO-550. > > I use a system that flows 35 GPM liquid propane at about 200 psi. > That generates a flame about 100 feet high. That kind of flow > might be excessive even in an Lancair IV. > > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >