X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:00:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pan.gwi.net ([207.5.128.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPS id 2104037 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:11:03 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.5.128.165; envelope-from=dhc1@gwi.net Received: from S0032744976 (d-216-195-154-9.gwi.net [216.195.154.9]) by pan.gwi.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l5FAAKml025452 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:10:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dhc1@gwi.net) X-Original-Message-ID: <009901c7af35$615052d0$0500000a@S0032744976> From: "Bill Wade" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Boost Pump X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:10:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Bob- Thanks for catching that, I misread the label. It is indeed 35 GPH. 35 GPM *would* tend to overload the return, wouldn't it? What are you barbecuing? I think this has been suggested before but I'm thinking about using an ON [low]-OFF-(MOM) [high] switch for the boost with a separate guarded ON-OFF switch wired in parallel for the high side marked something like "Emergency Boost". Now to see if I could remember that five years from now when I get to that point... The Lancair circuit includes a primer solenoid that's energized at high boost. The TCM schematic shows a primer that diverts flow from the spider to a primer nozzle, and includes an oil pressure switch to disable the primer circuit when the engine is running. Is this the same setup that Lancair uses? Thanks- Bill Wade ----- Original Message ----- From: "bob mackey" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:53 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Boost Pump > >> I'm looking at a Dukes pump that's rated 11.0 PSI low and 25 PSI >> on high. Flow rate is 35 GPM @ 21.0 PSI. I don't know how this >> compares to the pumps being used in Lancair installations, but >> wouldn't seem that the Dukes could overload the system, especially >> if the engine-driven pump was inoperative. >> If you were idling and hit the high boost, yes. At full TO power it >> should >> be less than the engine-driven output. My question is: could the output >> of >> the two pumps combine and overwhelm the return line causing pressure and >> thus fuel flow to go out of limits? > > Bill: > You might want to check those specs... you wrote that the > Dukes pump is rated at 35 GPM (gallons per MINUTE) > while the engine uses 32-36 GPH (gallons per HOUR). > > If you can really fill a 5 gallon can from the Dukes pump > in 8.57 seconds, it can probably flood an IO-550. > > I use a system that flows 35 GPM liquid propane at about 200 psi. > That generates a flame about 100 feet high. That kind of flow > might be excessive even in an Lancair IV. > > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > >