X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [70.222.56.233] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.9)
  with HTTP id 2103456 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:50:39 -0400
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Legacy Brake Woes-Need Ideas
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.9
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:50:39 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2103456@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <764614.57032.qm@web53705.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <764614.57032.qm@web53705.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div id="_htmlarea_default_style_" style="font:10pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> Posted for Kyrilian Dyer &lt;kyrilian_av@yahoo.com&gt;:<br><br> This brings up a question I've had regarding the Legacy brake system.  What <br>is the benefit of running the pilot side output through the copilot master <br>cylinders and _then_ to the brakes?  If there's a leak in the lines between <br>the pilot and copilot side the pilot loses his brakes.  Why not swap sides? <br> What am I missing?<br>   <br>  I presume the parking brake valve gets installed downstream of the copilot <br>master cylinders for those who install it (or pilot side if swapping sides as <br>above).  Is this correct?<br>   <br>  Sorry Rick.  I don't have any insight into your brake problem.<br>   <br>  - Kyrilian<br>
<br></div>