X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:21:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.5000feet.com ([24.196.78.220] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPS id 2101392 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:37:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.196.78.220; envelope-from=Tim@5000feet.com Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([10.18.250.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by cruising.5000feet.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/TO20070203) with ESMTP id l5E5a35u014333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:36:25 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <4670D3B9.2030805@5000feet.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:35:53 -0500 From: Tim Olson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FreeFlight 1101/ Trutrak interface References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That was one of my thoughts as I was writing my last reply.....the old "IF the Freeflight speaks in NMEA". I figured someone else must know more (Alan ;)) because I don't have a Freeflight so I haven't gone down that road yet. Great point though Rob...you probably can't just wire a FF like a PP and have it work. Tim Rob Logan wrote: > > here are the updated drawings for the FF, > last I checked the FF doesn't do nema (why its not -2 > chelton code) and the TT wants nema. (only for heading > not for flight path) if thats still the case, this > print will not work.. (the PP does nema and would work > fine into the TT leaving the FF to chelton) > > but what do I know, perhaps a call to the mfg is in order... > http://cheltonflightsystems.com/contact.html > > Rob > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >