X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:39:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net ([206.18.177.54] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2099742 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:37:40 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.18.177.54; envelope-from=mjrav@comcast.net Received: from mjr (c-24-60-93-2.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[24.60.93.2]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with SMTP id <20070613093701b14001i2ffe>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:37:01 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <002b01c7ad9e$4f60f220$025d3c18@mjr> From: "Mark Ravinski" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] prop clock X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:36:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7AD7C.C7F52430" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7AD7C.C7F52430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ballance could be an issue. Nothing is ever perfectly balanced. This = would account for vibration changes - Is that what you meant by "rough". Mark Ravinski N360KB ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Paul Lipps=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2:56 AM Subject: [LML] prop clock Is there anyone who knows the actual reason why changing the position = of the prop on the crank flange may make a rough running engine-prop = combo become smooth or vice versa? An acquaintenance of mine told me = that when he moved his prop around one mounting hole it became very = smooth. I have read the same on various sites, but the reason why that = would be truly escapes me. No guesses or surmises; just the facts, mam! ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7AD7C.C7F52430 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ballance could be an issue.  = Nothing is ever=20 perfectly balanced.  This would account for vibration changes - Is = that=20 what you meant by "rough".
 
Mark Ravinski
N360KB
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Paul=20 Lipps
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 = 2:56=20 AM
Subject: [LML] prop clock

Is there anyone who knows the actual reason = why changing=20 the position of the prop on the crank flange may make a rough running=20 engine-prop combo become smooth or vice versa? An = acquaintenance of=20 mine told me that when he moved his prop around one mounting hole it = became=20 very smooth. I have read the same on various sites, but the reason why = that=20 would be truly escapes me. No guesses or surmises; just the facts,=20 mam!
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C7AD7C.C7F52430--