X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:58:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from global.delionsden.com ([66.150.29.112] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPS id 2096845 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:52:02 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.150.29.112; envelope-from=n103md@yahoo.com Received: from bmackey by global.delionsden.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hxoyu-0000zA-Iw for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:51:12 -0400 Received: from 12.146.139.19 ([12.146.139.19]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user bmackey) by www.bmackey.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:51:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <55429.12.146.139.19.1181587872.squirrel@www.bmackey.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Boost switch From: "bob mackey" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - global.delionsden.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32015 2012] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - yahoo.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: > What failure modes exist where fuel pressure may drop but adding more > fuel will make the problem worse (i.e. the boost pump coming on > automatically)? A broken fuel line would be somewhat worse with the boost pump automatically activated. > Is there something that can be done to the normally aspirated > continental IO-550 that no matter how many pumps are driving > fuel to the engine, the mixture control is still very much in charge? In order to make the mixture knob the solitary control of fuel/air ratio, the sensitivity to fuel pressure must be eliminated. That could be done by regulating the fuel pressure just upstream of the injector servo. As some have noted, making such a change offers new opportunities to make tragic errors. One area of concern would be what to do with the excess fuel at the regulator? Return it to the same tank? Or always return to the tank it came from? On the other hand, pressure regulation might solve the pilot interface problem of having multiple interacting mixture controls (mixture + boost pumps). -bob