X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:20:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2091321 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:07:16 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.92.169; envelope-from=ronlaughlin@gmail.com Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 32so947349ugm for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:06:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PEOYQJcb/TOwmDWrHoAkTr7qsnICxKfqInUVbTGTLVWQWp7F9TYZZQCQScAIFA1Elj5lqKDzjNwWVQRS7A3iTdd1V5IR3WnS6GVqLU6uyawCA4vbK2+ugkSMctQV3f5IlCv7t/YjGxLuZnS1YNa2xOORk1nuElypwqy3W0VlhMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mB1GZafuPzZeaLrjEZ+qBZnI6zesv9ps7hyQgoO+uUoKOZ4MtZDb7jT12mGunRrWZ2ig0RBXkM3ESLGE+xNd+tBOVoUtN1eQkvxTbf3RPpN6/V3NlekaRg1jtOzw+VjOzRSie23gFePfzIt6LMtETh85Zb8w4+bAoTgST2utQkE= Received: by 10.78.175.14 with SMTP id x14mr1248508hue.1181311596954; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.14.15 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 07:06:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <6412e9f20706080706p1a1a2215ja87034b46e362114@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:06:36 -0500 From: "Ron Laughlin" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: What's better than a Continental IO-550 fuel system? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: > or 128:1. As for it causing an additional failure mode, I suppose it could > if the operator failed to add it, but this is another of those checklist > items, and once you're aware of the requirement it would take a pretty Hi Marv, Sorry, I wasn't exactly clear about my concerns here. Failing to add oil is certainly a possibility but not what I was really concerned about. From a previous life of motorcycle racing, I remember that below 40F, oil mixed with fuel will begins to separate. This was caster oil. I suspect that newer 2-stroke oils (synthetic?) may stay in solution better but don't have any experience to verify that. Anyway, our engines didn't run very well when it was below 40F. I don't remember any serious engine failures as a result of this but it did cause poor performance, fouled plugs and a lot of grief. At higher altitudes this could be a problem, no? If I were injecting the oil with a single pump, I see a single point failure mode there but pump pressure could be monitored. I guess If the stock engine "dribblers" provide adequate lubrication at continuous 75% power settings, that might be the safest method. We're already trained to watch engine oil levels very closely. -- Ron Laughlin Legacy N44L (res)