Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #42556
From: Lancair <lancair-esp@ustek.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: What's better than a Continental IO-550 fuel system?
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:49:32 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
From: Mark Steitle [mailto:msteitle@gmail.com]
The rotary is a very durable engine.  
 
I owned and drove a Mazda RX-2 for a few years during the liesure suit era.  Like many Wankel engines during that state of development the seals failed, but only after a month demonstrating its condition.  With 80,000 miles on it Mazda stepped up and repaired the engine at no cost to me, and I kept on driving until the body rusted out.  After more than three decades of improvement I expect that the new engine designs and materials are even better so the engine's reliability is not the issue.  It's not the engine that concerns me but rather that relatively untested speed reduction units.  We have seen their continued development and improvement with the smaller Subaru powered aircraft but no one has the tens of thousands of hours on a 300+hp system that is required to calm my nerves IFR, at night, over the Rockies. 
 
Robert M. Simon
ES-P N301ES
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster