X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:30:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2090065 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:51:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.232; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so559489wra for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:50:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=um5MDxmpBsyMd72dLUNtmaEvchRu2wDttcXj4h6OsaOhUPJbeEfXRYe0uTMfcjuRNd4m1XtRPpfx1aptFcpLMmt/Ypl1preNzYj7sM/tmnwH0UHwGrWY7FokWPfWrcC3ki8hb/STisv1OVmX20sPg1ukzKb+LTw8e3/yXJoyM3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MEABznvnIhLHqQAqo/E8EaFP2kSVvr0+HChn7kU1xwWFVdxCDVhlRgcN6l7G7wBMnBr0hYK0VoxXtzH80IxGDsqVLhYPPM7CHpMxA8g9kimjosv+X5f+rumaVRJ3MUqWUgiJYu/Y6kAHLqtfr/++tdh36i6zLIGCm3Qtw9RrG0A= Received: by 10.100.136.8 with SMTP id j8mr1341208and.1181253053983; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.38.20 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <5cf132c0706071450t6fb6e425q1e71c797619acca@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:50:53 -0500 From: "Mark Steitle" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: What's better than a Continental IO-550 fuel system? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_65768_19361192.1181253053907" References: ------=_Part_65768_19361192.1181253053907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mike/Kevin, I don't think I said that the IO-550 was poorly designed. I just think that fewer parts are better. My experience with certified engines does not leave me with the same warm, fuzzy feelings as you have. I'll leave it at that. Appreciate the chance to discuss this with you guys. There are a number of rotaries flying with good results. But you're correct, thousands of hours tends to make you more comfortable flying behind a particular engine. Mark S. On 6/7/07, marv@lancair.net wrote: > > Posted for MikeEasley@aol.com: > > Mark, > > My comments weren't intended to say the Mazda is not reliable. I just have > > a tough time following all the logic on how the IO-550 engine is poorly > designed. You definitely have you work cut out for you in getting that > engine > installed and making sure everything is going to work well. I just ordered > > the > engine and associated hoses and stuff and hooked it all up, pretty much a > no-brainer. > > Mike > > > > -- > > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > > ------=_Part_65768_19361192.1181253053907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Mike/Kevin,
 
I don't think I said that the IO-550 was poorly designed.  I just think that fewer parts are better.  My experience with certified engines does not leave me with the same warm, fuzzy feelings as you have.  I'll leave it at that.  Appreciate the chance to discuss this with you guys.
 
There are a number of rotaries flying with good results.  But you're correct, thousands of hours tends to make you more comfortable flying behind a particular engine.
 
Mark S.

 
On 6/7/07, marv@lancair.net <marv@lancair.net> wrote:
Posted for MikeEasley@aol.com:

Mark,

My comments weren't intended to say the Mazda is not reliable. I just have
a tough time following all the logic on how the IO-550 engine is poorly
designed. You definitely have you work cut out for you in getting that
engine
installed and making sure everything is going to work well. I just ordered
the
engine and associated hoses and stuff and hooked it all up, pretty much a
no-brainer.

Mike

 

------=_Part_65768_19361192.1181253053907--