X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:12:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.240.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2087431 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:00:04 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.8; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070606145921.TBGD8985.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:59:21 -0400 Received: from bh1 ([72.192.254.103]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 8EzK1X00G2EdYPc0000000; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:59:19 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001801c7a84b$58588bc0$6501a8c0@bh1> From: "Bill & Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Low fuel warning X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:59:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Hello Peter, I use 4 gallons for a "last chance" warning. In my 320 I can make that last at least 45 minutes. I also have an automatic system that keeps the header between 8 and 10 gallons. I have a Vision Micro capacitance gauge and a sight gauge on the header. I like the header system so much that I'm building pretty much the exact same system into my IV with a header tank between the firewall and the panel mostly on the right side. I can get 18 gallons into the IV header. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,350 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction > Hi, > just want to know opinions what volume is practical for a "very last" low > fuel warning (20 liter - about 6 gallons) in the header tank of a > carburated 360. It is a standard installation with forward canopy and an > electrical fuel gauge. In addition I plan for an automatic refuelling. > This very last warning is intended in case refuelling does not work and I > am busy with other things and to give me a hint for immediate landing. > It works independent of the gauge. > Thanks > Peter, 360 MKII, 85%