X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:15:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2084121 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:13:32 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.144.207; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.d08.11f8db8b (32915) for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:12:45 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] trailing static / pitot bomb ? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1181002364" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5365 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1181002364 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/4/2007 6:24:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, n103md@yahoo.com writes: Does anyone here have a trailing pitot/static or just static bomb that I could borrow? I'd like to speed up the experiments I've been doing to correct the static errors on my 235. Also, if anyone has suggestions on how to trail and retract the device, I'm open to suggestions. I think I have a workable method, but there may be a better way. Bob, Borrow a decent GPS (Garmin ?96, ?30, etc.) and use any one of the many methods (2,3 or 4 legs) to calibrate the true airspeed. Use that (with some calculations if you don't have an electronic airspeed calculator aboard) to correct the IAS. Thus, you can avoid all the, uh, limitations of old methods. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This! ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1181002364 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 6/4/2007 6:24:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 n103md@yahoo.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Does=20 anyone here have a trailing pitot/static
or just static bomb that I cou= ld=20 borrow?
I'd like to speed up the experiments I've been
doing to corr= ect=20 the static errors on my 235.

Also, if anyone has suggestions on how= to=20 trail and
retract the device, I'm open to suggestions.
I think I hav= e a=20 workable method, but there may
be a better way.
=
Bob,
 
Borrow a decent GPS (Garmin ?96, ?30, etc.) and use any one o= f=20 the many methods (2,3 or 4 legs) to calibrate the true airspeed.&n= bsp;=20 Use that (with some calculations if you don't have an electronic airspeed=20 calculator aboard) to correct the IAS.  Thus, you can avoid all th= e,=20 uh, limitations of old methods.
 
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)

Darwinian culling phrase: Watch=20 This!



See what's fr= ee at AOL.com.=
-------------------------------1181002364--