X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:32:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtai03.charter.net ([209.225.8.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2080453 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:09:52 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.8.183; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from aa07.charter.net ([10.20.200.159]) by mtai03.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070602160915.QWVU1549.mtai03.charter.net@aa07.charter.net> for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:09:15 -0400 Received: from karen473fcf455 ([75.139.140.126]) by aa07.charter.net with ESMTP id <20070602160915.TCCI12201.aa07.charter.net@karen473fcf455> for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:09:15 -0400 From: "Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: TSIO 550 LOP X-Original-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:09:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0054_01C7A50E.D8CBF980" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-index: AcelFfBuuPC9Qbo/SVOxv8FqwBXvqwAGeSwA X-Original-Message-Id: <20070602160915.TCCI12201.aa07.charter.net@karen473fcf455> X-Chzlrs: 0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C7A50E.D8CBF980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George, I put in less gas than the fuel used says has been used. It is about 1 gallon per hour (at cruise) less usage than the fuel flow says. Lynn _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv@lancair.net Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 9:00 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: TSIO 550 LOP Posted for "George Braly" : Lynn, Something "doesn't fit". IF you were 103d LOP - - - at 18.9 gph, the MP would have had to be up around 36" . It wasn't. I suspect that your fuel flow gage is in error. But it could be some other issues. Have you calibrated your fuel flow against the gas pump re-fill volumes ? George Farnsworth wrote """ When I was being checked in the plane out by Orin Ridell he did a "GAMI" check. I believe the # 5 EGT peaked at 1528 F. That is what I've used as the reference EGT for adjusting to lean of peak. Based on that, this flight was 103 F lean of peak. Why am I getting the feeling that I may have been operating using incorrect procedures/data? Lynn """ -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C7A50E.D8CBF980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

George,

=

I put in less gas than the fuel = used says has been used. It is about 1 gallon per hour (at cruise) less usage than = the fuel flow says.

Lynn

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv@lancair.net
Sent: Saturday, June 02, = 2007 9:00 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: TSIO = 550 LOP

Posted for "George = Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:

Lynn,

Something "doesn't fit".

IF you were 103d LOP - - - at 18.9 gph, the MP would have had to be
up around 36" . It wasn't.

I suspect that your fuel flow gage is in error. But it could be some
other issues.

Have you calibrated your fuel flow against the gas pump re-fill = volumes
?

George

Farnsworth wrote
"""
When I was being checked in the plane out by Orin Ridell he did a "GAMI"
check. I believe the # 5 EGT peaked at 1528 F. That is what I've used = as
the reference EGT for adjusting to lean of peak. Based on that, this
flight was 103 F lean of peak.

Why am I getting the feeling that I may have been operating using
incorrect procedures/data?

Lynn
"""

--

For =
archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C7A50E.D8CBF980--