Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:37:15 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1915917@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.211; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com
In-Reply-To: <list-1915688@logan.com>
From: "Bill Kennedy" <bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: enough runway"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

I agree with Jeff. I also think a touch and go should be second nature if 
you're at all concerned about getting your plane stopped in the available 
runway.

Bill Kennedy
N42BK


>From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com
>Reply-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
>To: lml@lancaironline.net
>Subject: [LML] Re: enough runway"
>Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:37:21 -0400
>
>If you think you need a drag chute for the occasional "aw shit the runway  
>is
>too dang short" instances then IMHO your preflight planning is flawed. Like 
>I
>  said before, take the distance you can get the aircraft stopped in (from 
>a
>50'  height) and then double that and that is your landing distance
>requirement. 50%  of all GA accidnts are takeoff and landing accidents. 
>Being too
>optimistic on  landing distance required is not a good thing.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff Edwards
>LIVP N619SJ
><BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
>email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at
>http://www.aol.com.

_________________________________________________________________
With tax season right around the corner, make sure to follow these few 
simple tips. 
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?icid=HMFebtagline