X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:37:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web54312.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with SMTP id 1915623 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:00:31 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.49.122; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 45769 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2007 23:59:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fL0BG3EFSmL2oxr7wf8NrFkt7XWNyISYXYKU54uA/F5LZ72i4w1MVwu9xGQBW9ZRe88K8S3g+1zvnvLjIT9A/QGPmvdbz7Pe7WuEcNVqSxlFzIBo/TP/FkQ/gAxrEnQtEkhoXzsWhjSuBGUxz4vlTvVMiRLyptuKOE7Kfs6kdPM=; X-YMail-OSG: Lkn5e.wVM1kE4JFbrMFJWkFEP4ZPF1d5J2AQ12bZaKz07wGFwwmXleysN7Aytd9z8GshKJy1YI4_btxfC8Of4eTQXCPRWmtDEcOLonfxd5xNZymy395RVQRNz5c0eDLmg2fczoGjqsVSZ31Klbv0NZ.qCg-- Received: from [67.50.40.154] by web54312.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:59:40 PDT X-Original-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:59:40 -0700 (PDT) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 235/320/360 nose gear over center drag link X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: <214034.43601.qm@web54312.mail.yahoo.com> Thanks for the note Greg, Some appear to wear worse than others. Mine is not bad, but it will be if I leave it as it is. I spoke with the fine folks at Lancair to see how many of these they sell. The gal I spoke with was not sure but the lower end is on back order... Someone is buying them... Thanks for your experience.. Randy Snarr --- kneaded pleasures wrote: > It is my impression that very few of these links > have been replaced in several tens of thousands of > flying hours of the 235/320/360 fleet. If true, > then why re-engineer this part? Why not just > replace it with new when it shows signs of wear? > After 6 years, 400 hours, 1100 landings and, yes, > more than my share of inept/abrupt landings, my link > shows no sign of elongation or wear. Greg Nelson ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/