Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.gateway.net ([208.230.117.246]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:24:15 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (1Cust145.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.27.107.145]) by smtp2.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA01402 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:28:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000701bf4239$085f5de0$916b1b3f@oemcomputer> Reply-To: "dfs" From: "dfs" To: "Lancair List" Subject: Center of Gravity Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 03:32:09 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To Bill Harrelson: Your battery system sounds super! I wish I'd thought of that. However, I'm afraid my CG would be way too far forward if I located the battery that far forward. I have a RG 25 behind the rear bulkhead - of course, with a O-235, it's probably a bit lighter than your engine. But I definitely am thinking of stealing your dual battery concept the next time I have to replace my battery. they both can sit side by side right where the single unit is located now. One can't have enough redundancy - particularly if it doesn't weigh too much. Again, great idea. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>