X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.6) with HTTP id 1840462 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:30:18 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: DH Lines- LNC-2's retrofit To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.6 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:30:18 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87C33F695961494D886EB3B6C8A47651256118@s3server.Systems3.local> References: <87C33F695961494D886EB3B6C8A47651256118@s3server.Systems3.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Craig Berland" : Marv, For ref: 303 SS tensile is 90ksi. Tensile for 3003 in the "O" condition & cabin temperatures is 16ksi Tensile for 5052 in the "O" condition & cabin temperatures is 28ksi Tensile for type T & H Nylaflow, Nylon 6/6 & cabin temperatures is 12ksi (Type T in 3/16 dia is .025 wall and type H in 3/16 dia is .038 wall) Both aluminum alloys are more than adequate for brake lines that are 3/16 dia and .025 wall unless you "kink" it... The aluminum is much more cut resistant. As far as minimum diameter, I don't know. I'd use 3/16 because I don't have a 1/8 diameter bender....how's that for engineering principle. Craig Berland Marv wrote: """ What's the smallest ID hard line that would be appropriate for the brake line runs from the pedals to the wheel wells? I have some 1/8" versatube that I bought for this purpose way back when, but I'm afraid that #1 its working pressure is too low and #2 the .069ID may simply be too small to allow the brakes to respond to pedal inputs quickly enough. There's hardly any weight increase going to 3/16od, .135id, so that would be ok by me. Also, instead of the versatube (3003) would it make more sense to use 5052? Stainless for the interior runs seems like way overkill. Thoughts or comments? """ [Thanks, Craig... that helps put things into perspective. I chose the 1/8" 3003 because of its great flexibility. You don't need a regular tubing bender to bend it, just those springs that cradle the material through the bend process that limit the bend radius and keep the walls from collapsing. I figured once they were run they would be protected behind the uphostery or carpets and wouldn't have an chance to get beat up. Anyway, now if I find that .069ID will flow enough to get the job done I don't have to change anything Thanks again. ]