X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.6) with HTTP id 1830228 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:59:37 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Propjet Strake To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.6 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:59:37 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <065e01c74de7$170cafc0$45260f40$@net> References: <065e01c74de7$170cafc0$45260f40$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "JHWebb" : In a past life I had the finances of a fairly large comporation to experiment and we were told by suposely knowledgeable aeronautiaclc expert to angle the vertical fins for the rotating slipstream and P factor. It turns out that this makes the airplane more difficult to fly. Requires a lot of rudder trim changes. After much expermantation we discovered that straigt ahead worked best. Then you don't have to trim for any speed change as well as power changes. If the vertical surface has 0 deflection you only have to trim for power changes and at higher speeds this requirement is almost zero. Sumerizing the best configuration is no defection, plus it produces lower drag overall. Jack Webb L360, LIV BSAE """ BTW - Our fin is perfectly aligned with the direction of flight, but maybe a different alignment is better due to the asymmetry of the airflow from the prop. Does anyone have any experience with this? """