X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:57:52 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1830102 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:45:02 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c0a.fd74fb6 (40521) for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:44:05 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:44:03 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Collaborating on checklists X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1171201443" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5354 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1171201443 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If nothing else, we can prevent duplication of effort in building our own personal checklists. If someone has digitized the printed Legacy POH, for example, they can make their "starting point" copy available on this list. John Schroeder did that for us ES guys. Just like the factory POH, we all have noodled through John's version and made intelligent decisions on what to change, most often with the help of Ron Galbraith or another HPAT guru. Ron's suggestion that you do things in an order that you are familiar with makes sense since we all have flown other birds in the past. Certainly, you don't want to do something the "old way" if it jeopardizes the integrity of the checklist, but if it's an item that could be put in a couple different places, why not put it where you have the least chance of skipping it. I should also mention that Joe B. has officially said we should use the Lancair POH as a starting point, as far as I know Lancair doesn't make the POHs available in digital format. Both the Columbia and Cirrus POHs are available on their web sites in PDF format. I have a copy of the new ES builders manual in PDF format, so maybe it's time to get the POHs online for the pilots to edit. Mike Easley Colorado Springs -------------------------------1171201443 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If nothing else, we can prevent duplication of effort in building our o= wn=20 personal checklists. If someone has digitized the printed Legacy=20= POH,=20 for example, they can make their "starting point" copy available on this=20 list. John Schroeder did that for us ES guys. Just like the fact= ory=20 POH, we all have noodled through John's version and made intelligent decisio= ns=20 on what to change, most often with the help of Ron Galbraith or another HPAT= =20 guru.

Ron's suggestion that you do things in an order that you are familiar w= ith=20 makes sense since we all have flown other birds in the past. Certainly= ,=20 you don't want to do something the "old way" if it jeopardizes the integrity= of=20 the checklist, but if it's an item that could be put in a couple different=20 places, why not put it where you have the least chance of skipping it.

I should also mention that Joe B. has officially said we should use the= =20 Lancair POH as a starting point, as far as I know Lancair doesn't make the P= OHs=20 available in digital format. Both the Columbia and Cirrus POHs are=20 available on their web sites in PDF format. I have a copy of the new E= S=20 builders manual in PDF format, so maybe it's time to get the POHs online for= the=20 pilots to edit.

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

-------------------------------1171201443--