Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:39:50 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1828835@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=douglasbrunner@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=n5PMhuKBib2589ZYwEdKwF63wIREUHrxFMe1Nv8ZR13mq6HwkwvLYHQJC9SNVXth;
  h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Douglas Brunner" <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>
References: <list-1828555@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Collaborating on checklists
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am not sure if this is in reference to something that I posted several 
days
ago or not, in any case...

I am interested in finding other Legacy flyers to collaborate on a digital 
POH.
So far I have found one other person to help.

The point is not that we intend to write the POH based on our own knowledge
but that we want/need people to share the trouble of RETYPING the existing
Lancair written POH.  I am interested  in producing a FAITHFUL COPY of the 
Lancair
written  POH.  Once we have finished it, it will be available to all that
want it. (Apparently Lancair doesn't have a digital version that they can 
share.)

 Legacy pilots will be able to do what they want with this "template" - just 
like they can
when building the airplane.  Personally, I intend to alter it substantially 
to take into account the different equipment that my plane will have, things 
I have learned from Advanced Pilot
Seminars (the GAMI  sponsored engine management seminar), and things I learn 
from qualified instructors/experts on flying the plane.

D. Brunner
N241DB
50% - 70% to go


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Stallard" <Kevin@arilabs.net>
To: <lml>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: [LML] Collaborating on checklists


"I would be interested in collaborating on a Legacy Check list."

Guys,

If I may be so bold.  Collaboration isn't necessarily a good thing.  If
you want sources of information that you can bet your life on, the only
collaboration you should consider is collaborating with experts, not
just users.  I would be dubious of information put together based on
consensus.  It's the perfect the Blind Leading the Blind scenario (Just
so there is no misunderstanding, I'm in the Blind category too when it
comes to the understanding of the safe operation of a Legacy, I'm still
learning).

I am personally uncomfortable collaborating with anyone else than those
I look up to and consider to have consistently have proven to be
competent.  These currently include Pete Zaccagnino and his band of
merry men.  I would give ear to Tim Ong as well.  But I can't think of
anyone else with regards to the safe operation of a Legacy.

I guess what I'm trying to say is; don't collaborate with us here on
LML.  Collaborate with competent, informed individuals that you have to
pay to get training/advice.  And please, don't undermine/water down what
Pete and his trainers do for you by publishing something they give you
and that is wholly incomplete without their training and perspective.

Best Regards,
Kevin
L2K-291


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/