Return-Path: Received: from imo-d09.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.41]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 01:04:16 -0500 Received: from Fredmoreno@aol.com by imo-d09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id k.0.9de6462e (4234) for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 01:08:49 -0500 (EST) From: Fredmoreno@aol.com Message-ID: <0.9de6462e.2574c3f1@aol.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 01:08:49 EST Subject: Water in Static Lines To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> My recollection is that the static lines in our C-182 (one on either side of fuselage) are configured as follows: static port, 90 degree fitting up, a small plastic bottle about 1 inch diameter by 3 inches long with an exit port out the top, then the line goes up for several inches before making its way forward to the panel. My earlier C-182 sat outside in the elements for 19 years and I never had a problem with water in the static lines although the tail cone filled with water once (slosh slosh while wiggling rudder in preflight). I think the bottles must help separate the water from air during cross winds, and lets the water subsequently drain out the static port. Fred >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>