Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.gateway.net ([208.230.117.247]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 03:32:25 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (1Cust186.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.27.107.186]) by smtp3.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA19368 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 03:36:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000501bf3a45$33b64180$ba6b1b3f@oemcomputer> Reply-To: "dfs" From: "dfs" To: "Lancair List" Subject: Water in Static Lines Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:39:06 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Just a short note to Bob Jude: I have all that - it seems that no matter how large one makes the water trap, in some circumstances even that will fill up. Brent mentioned that he thought the differential pressure due to high wind across the fuselage forced the water in - I agree - even through the "up-hill" section of the tube. In addition, the way the static line runs, e.g., along the floor thru the center console area, it's such a long horizontal run that it's difficult to designate a "lowest" point in the run for a drain. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>