Return-Path: Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.2]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 17:26:36 -0500 Received: from Jimnordin@aol.com by imo12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id k.0.cbb8081e (4198) for ; Sun, 28 Nov 1999 17:31:00 -0500 (EST) From: Jimnordin@aol.com Message-ID: <0.cbb8081e.25730724@aol.com> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 17:31:00 EST Subject: Over center link alignment on 360FB To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 360 FB Builders.. I have a problem with the alignment of the GM4 bracket causing interference with the hydraulic ram rod end when extended. I mounted the GM4 to the primary (GM12) and secondary attach points (phenolic block) as instructed. I cleaned up the aft surface of the phenolic so the GM4 would fit flush (overhanging fiberglass etc). After installation of the main landing gear and it's alignment (chapter 5) I began fitting the hydraulics and the over center link assembly. When the hydraulic ram is attached to the assembly, the rod end on the hydraulic ram interfers with the aluminum tabs (main retract cylinder attach point) of the assembly when the ram is brought to the specified 1.25 inches from the closeout rib of the spar. This is the cylindrical phenolic standoff I'm talking about (5-58). Trying to figure out what causes the interference, I looked from above the GM4 and sited down from the top spar. The GM4 where it attaches to the GM12 is nearly flush, 1/16", aft of the trailing edge of the top front spar cap. The aft side of the inboard end of GM4 is fully 5/16" behind the trailing edge of the top front spar cap making it 1/4" aft of the outboard aft edge. This seems to be the cause of the interference on the aluminum attach tabs with the rod end. If the GM4 bracket were flush with the trailing edge (as is the outboard end), there'd be no interference. Is there triming of the phenolic secondary attach point to be made to cure this problem? Or do I simply make the cylindrical phenolic standoff 1.5 inches rather than 1.25 inches? Bottom line.. how do I best cure the problem? Page 5-61 bottom suggest to "Pull the over ctr link into the approx retract pos and check for a "no bind" condition". No suggestion how to cure it however... Thanks for the help.... jim nordin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>