X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:11:43 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [68.98.211.24] (HELO systems3.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1711544 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:22:21 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.98.211.24; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C72777.94CB38AA" Subject: D2A/Chelton X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:21:17 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <87C33F695961494D886EB3B6C8A47651221326@s3server.Systems3.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: D2A/Chelton Thread-Index: Accnd4ne+Ts/0c06Qa+87WDPUXULDw== From: "Craig Berland" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C72777.94CB38AA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm certainly not in the "inner circle" of the avionics industry, so I may be the only one confused. =20 The Chelton release said they did not have any open or backordered purchase orders from D2A. D2A is the sole distributor for Chelton experimental products. This does not make any sense to me for several reasons. I know that there are five Chelton Pro 10 systems on order with just one panel builder. I am one of those orders.(since OSH) I have noted that a very high percentage of all ES's and IV-P's recently finished have Chelton displays. I was told there is a huge number of RV's being finished each month and a good portion of those are RV10's. Could it be possible that none of the coming completions have specified a Chelton system? Could it be possible that Chelton does not know about the $250,000 worth of Pro 10 hardware wanted by just on panel builder? =20 I have come to believe when something does not make sense, big hunks of data are missing. =20 Craig Berland IV-P flying in 2007 (If I can get a timely panel) ------_=_NextPart_001_01C72777.94CB38AA Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm = certainly not in=20 the "inner circle" of the avionics industry, so I may be the only one=20 confused.
 
The = Chelton release=20 said they did not have any open or backordered purchase orders from = D2A. =20 D2A is the sole distributor for Chelton experimental products.  = This does=20 not make any sense to me for several reasons.  I know that there = are five=20 Chelton Pro 10 systems on order with just one panel builder.  = I am one=20 of those orders.(since OSH)  I have noted that a very high = percentage of=20 all ES's and IV-P's recently finished have Chelton displays. I was told = there is=20 a huge number of RV's being finished each month and a good portion of = those are=20 RV10's.  Could it be possible that none of the coming completions = have=20 specified a Chelton system?  Could it be possible that Chelton does = not=20 know about the $250,000 worth of Pro 10 hardware wanted by just on panel = builder?
 
I have = come=20 to believe when something does not make sense, big hunks of data = are=20 missing.
 
Craig=20 Berland
IV-P = flying in=20 2007
(If I = can get a=20 timely panel)
------_=_NextPart_001_01C72777.94CB38AA--