In a message dated 12/23/2006 7:37:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,
hwasti@starband.net writes:
All this
is mere observations and speculations from someone who has no
financial
training or credentials and whose opinions may be considered
biased
because of his close affiliation with Chelton.
Hamid,
Interesting..... After all, Chelton succumbed to the lure of
experimental aircraft by offering a special package. Why shouldn't
Garmin?
Garmin has about 25,000 430/530 GPS installed in the field. They
are losing money on converting such units to 430W/530W for a nominal fee, even
if they have been a bit slow. It may matter only to them if they
are now going to market products to the experimental/LSA field, already
about 26000 strong, if it makes long range marketing sense. Garmin is
pulling in profits hand-over-fist by introducing innovative consumer
products such as the Nuvi and Zumo (I have one) while maintaining a fabulous
reputation in the user community (aviation, marine, auto, motorcycle, hiking,
etc). Egads, their new units even use a non-Garmin base sensor, the very
sensitive SIRF GPS receiver.
BTW, I don't see Chelton being adopted by every certified aircraft
manufacturer - maybe there is something in the specs/price combo that just
doesn't ignite everyone's interest.
Let's not assume that Brent is right in thinking that Garmin would be
losing money by entering the experimental field - the next might
be LSA's, then ?????
GRMN: $30/shr to $50/shr in one year. Gee, they must be doing
something right.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)
A man
has got to know his limitations.