|
|
Jim,
Ahh, at last, clarity!
Of course, it matters not to me - my data plate says it is a Scott Krueger
engine (Lyc IO320, helicopter pistons, front induction system, no aviation
plugs, book-of-matches ignition, turboized injectors, etc.).
Grayhawk
Merry Christmas to all.
In a message dated 12/22/2006 6:26:08 P.M. Central Standard Time,
marv@lancaironline.net writes:
Posted
for "Jim Auman" <jimauman@comcast.net>:
If an engine is
"continuously" maintained in compliance with all of its Type
Certificate Data Sheet specs at each "annual" condition inspection
and logged in the engine's maintenance log then it does not matter if
it is on an experimental or normally certificated
airframe.
Difference here folks is that only a licenced A&P
with Inspection Authorization gets to "annual" anything.
Repairmen on Amateur-Built airplanes get to condition inspect
only. This point gets lost on many airmen debating this
subject.
IA's at each "annual" verify that the powerplant
conforms to it's TCDS, STC's, and approved field approvals of any
mods.
All of that needs to be seemless; hence, any deviation of
an engine, or accessory to it, not specifically provided for (above)
and "annualed" renders the engine experimental and interrupts the
"continuous" papertrail provision.
So if you do not
posess an Inspection Authorization on your A&P, you must have
the engine on your experimental torn down and inspected for
adherence to the manufacturer's specifications and the TCDS if your
ever wish to return it to the Normally certificated
community.
Of course, returning it to the manufacturer or
authorized overhauler will do the same thing if proper authorized
engine log entries are recorded.
A Lancairian (with an IA) can
keep an engine and prop "annualed" if no changes from the TCDS are
made during those uses on an experimental airframe and proper
maintenance log "annual inspection" entries are recorded at each
condition inspection.
Jim Auman
-- For archives
and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
|
|