X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:00:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1697687 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:47:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.6; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.cf1.54a0a3c (48552) for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:46:22 -0500 (EST) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:46:20 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Overhauled Engine now labeled "Experimental Only" ?? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1166701580" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5031 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1166701580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does the engine meet the origianl type design according to the type certificate data sheet? If it does not-- ie different pistons for a different compression ratio, etc. then it might be considered experimental. If it not then I would think it would not be experimental. Jeff -------------------------------1166701580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does the engine meet the origianl type design according to the type=20 certificate data sheet? If it does not-- ie different pistons for a differen= t=20 compression ratio, etc. then it might be considered experimental. If it not=20= then=20 I would think it would not be experimental.

Jeff

-------------------------------1166701580--