X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:42:04 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1688881 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:48:47 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.5; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c1c.be0249c (30739) for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:47:56 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:47:54 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: electric attitude indicators X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1166489274" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1166489274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en =20 In a message dated 12/18/2006 6:03:58 P.M. Central Standard Time, =20 marv@lancaironline.net writes: My 320 currently has lots of electronic items =E2=80=93 Sandel EHSI, Garmin= 430=E2=80=99s, STEC autopilot (replaces the Turn Coordinator), and ONE vacuum instrument =20= =E2=80=93 the Attitude Indicator. I like the idea of one of these 2 =C2=BC=E2=80=9D AI=E2=80=99s =E2=80=93 it= would be an ADDITION to what I am already flying. I fly lots of IFR, and my current backup is=E2=80=A6=20= the autopilot within the electric TC. Another AI would be a benefit, and I=E2=80=99d have lot=E2=80=99s of time t= o compare it to the primary (and TC) to check it=E2=80=99s functionality. If my primary fai= ls =E2=80=93 it=E2=80=99s an EMERGENCY =3D LAND. Matt, =20 Yep, land when the backup isn't there. =20 Grayhawk =20 PS Why do you think I am still around and gray? -------------------------------1166489274 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en

In a message dated 12/18/2006 6:03:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 marv@lancaironline.net writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>My 320=20 currently has lots of electronic items =E2=80=93 Sandel EHSI, Garmin 430= =E2=80=99s,
=20 STEC autopilot (replaces the Turn Coordinator), and ONE vacuum instrument=20 =E2=80=93
the Attitude Indicator.

I like th= e idea of=20 one of these 2 =C2=BC=E2=80=9D AI=E2=80=99s =E2=80=93 it would be an ADDIT= ION to what
I am=20 already flying. I fly lots of IFR, and my current backup is=E2=80= =A6=20 the
autopilot within the electric TC.

Anoth= er=20 AI would be a benefit, and I=E2=80=99d have lot=E2=80=99s of time to compa= re it to
=20 the primary (and TC) to check it=E2=80=99s functionality. If my prim= ary fails=20 =E2=80=93
it=E2=80=99s an EMERGENCY =3D LAND.

Matt,

Yep, land when the backup isn't there.

Grayhawk

PS Why do you think I am still around and gray?

-------------------------------1166489274--