X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:12:01 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1628904 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:41:58 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=rsimon@ustek.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C71578.8B3B5EF2" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. xm? Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:43:03 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. xm? Thread-Index: AccVbBmPKWL/F1FUSZ2laAd4eLUe1AADDj6g From: "Lancair" X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C71578.8B3B5EF2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought that Canada has a restriction against pilots using on-board NexRad because there is no standardized training for interpretation of the display. =20 =20 R =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of colyncase on earthlink Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:12 PM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. xm? Thanks for the responses.=20 Since my original post I've done more research.=20 Two announcements are possibly imminent:=20 1) WSI gets another panel mount partner (not Garmin)=20 2) XM gets Canada nexrad.=20 Either of these would be a big deal.=20 Colyn ------_=_NextPart_001_01C71578.8B3B5EF2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought = that Canada has=20 a restriction against pilots using on-board NexRad because there is no=20 standardized training for interpretation of the display.  =
 
R
 

From: Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of colyncase on=20 earthlink
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:12 = PM
To:=20 lml
Subject: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. = xm?

Thanks for the responses.=20

Since my original post I've done more research.=20

Two announcements are possibly imminent:=20

1) WSI gets another panel mount partner (not Garmin)=20

2) XM gets Canada nexrad.=20

Either of these would be a big deal.=20

=20

Colyn

------_=_NextPart_001_01C71578.8B3B5EF2--