X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:   1 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:12:01 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1629272@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rsimon@ustek.com>
Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3)
  with ESMTP id 1628904 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:41:58 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=rsimon@ustek.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C71578.8B3B5EF2"
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. xm?
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:43:03 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C274510F37A2@server1.USTEK>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: wsi quality vs. xm?
Thread-Index: AccVbBmPKWL/F1FUSZ2laAd4eLUe1AADDj6g
From: "Lancair" <lancair@USTEK.COM>
X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" <rsimon@ustek.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>