X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:37:52 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [206.229.254.14] (HELO smtp.perigee.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1624490 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:05:33 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.229.254.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study-2 (dsl-208-26-41-115.perigee.net [208.26.41.115]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kAUG53vM014967 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:05:03 -0500 X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:04:53 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New (2006) TSIO550E Lean of Peak (LOP) Operation References: From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.54 (Win32, build 7730) Walter - Put me down in the column of an acceptable set of injectors for our new IO-550N2. I did 3 GAMI lean checks and after the last one, John Paul said that the spread was acceptable - if the engine doesn't run rough LOP. So far, it is working. However, I was quite skeptical that this would be the case. I took your course (fabulous experience), but still have some questions. I'll drop you or John an email. Cheers, John Schroeder LNCE N58WP - Flying On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:11:33 -0500, Marvin Kaye wrote: > I've seen a few sets of TCM balanced injectors on an IO-520 Bx or IO-550 BB > which were actually "acceptable", but not many. They do get pretty fair > results on the IO-550N more often.