X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [24.51.79.189] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.3) with HTTP id 1622784 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:12:31 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: wsi quality vs. xm? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.3 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:12:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <63D0A1D8F168684F8502C4B8A229D791F1DD00@DEWEY2.Cadwell.cadwell.com> References: <63D0A1D8F168684F8502C4B8A229D791F1DD00@DEWEY2.Cadwell.cadwell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Carl Cadwell" : Colyn, I fly the XM WxWorx on a Toshiba Pentablet all hardwired (no Bluetooth wireless) in my Lancair IVP (about 500 hours with Wx on board) and WSI in the Epic on the Chelton system (160 hours). I don't think I can comment on the quality and accuracy question you are asking. I can relate my experiences flying with both of them. I like them both. I won't fly IFR without them anymore. They can help keep one out of harms way. They are both seem equal in knowing where you can fly safely and where you should avoid. They are both very useful to knowing where you can fly (deviate) to stay clear of weather systems or buildups. Overall the flights are much smoother as one deviates to avoid weather. I would never use either for penetrating a line of thunderstorms, nor have I attempted to do such. They both help avoid icing if you stay out of the green. My wife loves to be the onboard weather maven keeping me up to date on the metars, cell movements, distant areas of significant weather we are flying towards and what is happening elsewhere around the country in the weather department. WSI is more convenient in the Chelton as it is displayed on the moving maps, comes on automatically and is dash mounted. It is more reliable in having the data available. It has only failed to provide data on one occasion. The XM WxWorx on multiple occasions could not be used as I could not connect and had to call and have the program reactivated several times (4 or 5 times), the receiver antenna failed twice and the GPS 3 times. In every case XM and WxWorx were very responsive. Carl Cadwell