X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:34:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web54305.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with SMTP id 1614569 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:26:12 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.49.115; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 38520 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Nov 2006 03:25:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0H6tvTLMwX1Sw4qRlQe9uZPgUxDJQK0bisw+POBk34RcmNZGjexliM1Zmr5PUGH5Hcxnm8ccY0t7grjBnJqa5btYWRQueRlGObhjJ+14sPtVVQcx4w45PEqzYnN33TY+eDEp2pL67OrMj+4uRxoJ2IQsQp1XxP4r6KBuA79n8lU= ; X-Original-Message-ID: <20061128032553.38518.qmail@web54305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.50.40.154] by web54305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:25:53 PST X-Original-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:25:53 -0800 (PST) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Electrical /Hydraulic system questionslancair235/320 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Chris, I will check the part # on the pump tomorrow. Today when I was at the hangar I looked at the low side of the system. It indicated 600 psi. The high side was 0. I opened the dump valve and both sides equalized at around 300 or so. I closed the dump valve and turned on the master switch. the pump came on and pumped the down side back up to 600 or so and the up side went back to 0. Should the high and low sides equalize at something other than 0? Randy. --- Christopher Zavatson wrote: > Randy, > < and low sides build > pressure during flight. > Thoughts?>> > > Your case is somewhat perplexing. The retention of > pressure would > indicate a reversed spool valve, but only seeing 200 > psi during > retraction does not. If the system only retains 200 > psi (normal while > pumping), how does it retain 600 psi while static? > What bothers me is > that the fundamental purpose for the back pressure > circuit is to relieve > pressure on the low side to avoid tripping the > pressure switch > > As an aside, I always view pumps coming straight > from Oildyne as > suspect until operational tests confirm correct > assembly. Back in the > '98 time frame, I had my pump in for servicing - I > let it run dry while > working on some cylinders. Their shop manager > called me to find out why > my spool valve was in backwards. After several > minutes describing the > hydraulic system to him, he determined that my > 'backward' spool valve > was actually correct. The build instructions were > wrong. Low and > behold, one pump after another in the field started > exhibiting the > symptoms of a reversed spool valve. I don't know if > the paperwork ever > got fixed. Even the pump I had borrowed while mine > was out had a > reversed spool valve. I had to crank up the high > pressure side to get > the gear up all the way. Are you able you retrieve > a part number off > your pump? > > Chris > > > > > Chris Zavatson > N91CZ > 360std. > www.N91CZ.com > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited