X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:03:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1356208 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:43:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.111.2] ([70.19.74.145]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J4T008TUCRQUTXF@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:43:03 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:42:59 -0400 From: Kevin Kossi Subject: Fwd: [LML] Exiting a Legacy post crash X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: > John, > > That is exactly what I am planning. I am going to install a cam in- > between the two front Canopy hinges, that will pull pins out of the > two forward modified separable hinges. As for the Canopy sliding > back and decapitating me, or just taking out my teeth, I plan to > install a hinge on the rear of the canopy for it to pivot up and > back on. Some kind of hook that you engage, or a hinge made of > chain link with a pin you can put in before takeoff. I am working > with a Parachute company to develop a parachute that you don't sit > on, (I want comfort, and no excuses not to wear it) You will have > the usual harness straps, but the Chute Pack will slide into a > pocket behind the seat and down at a 45 deg angle. They said they > made something similar for another plane. > > > Kevin > > > On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Halle, John wrote: > >> Kevin wrote: >> >> "My question is, on the Legacy one of my fears is a hard landing and >> not being able to open the canopy; What are the thoughts on the >> custom openable windows made for the Legacy? It seams to me that >> structurally it is not a good idea, given the fact that the window is >> no longer part of the structure." >> >> It's a worry of mine too and, after four years of flying, I still >> don't >> have an answer for it. I think if you stay upright there should >> not be >> a problem, and history, at least so far, seems to bear that out. >> It's >> hard to imagine anything that would jam either the hinges or the >> latch >> mechanism. The thing I worry about is if you flip and end up upside >> down. In that case, I suspect you are stuck inside until someone >> cuts >> you out. Having gone in and out of the back window a few times >> during >> construction, I can attest to the fact that those of us who have >> put on >> a pound or two will find it a tight fit. Trying to get past the >> openable windows would, I fear, require a physique different from >> mine >> -- and that's assuming full functionality. I've thought of >> carrying one >> of those hammer thingys, a knife, a saw, pretty much everying. I >> think >> the best solution might be a battery powered dremmel but I have to >> say I >> don't carry one. >> >> Having spent last weekend getting my ICAS clearance to do rolls at >> airshows, I have another thing to think about: Is it possible to put >> "pullable" pins in the canopy hinge attachment so you could bail >> out in >> an emergency? We were talking about the rule that you have to have a >> parachute if you are dual and doing acrobatics and I pointed out that >> the highest and best use of a parachute in a conventionally built >> Legacy >> is as a seat back cushion. A set of hinge pins would fix that in the >> event of, say, a fire. It would also give you two ways to get out >> after >> a crash, asumming you were upright. >> >> -- >> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ >