X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1344478 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:38:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=cblitzer@triad.rr.com Received: from YOUR85A8F7B8EC (cpe-065-190-066-055.triad.res.rr.com [65.190.66.55]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7NCbwoC008669 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:38:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <002301c6c6b0$f74a6730$1102a8c0@YOUR85A8F7B8EC> From: "cblitzer" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] ok,, enough,, by why the non standard installation X-Original-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:37:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01C6C68F.6F8F67D0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C6C68F.6F8F67D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mr. K. I own a IV-P recip so for me, the emails between you and everyone else = about Walters D, Walters E, Diemetec, flow packs, high frequency etc.., = is merely entertainment. I do however as a lawyer, take personal issue with your statement that = Lawyers sue people to make a living. Lawyers practice law to make a = living and yes, sometimes that involves suing a party adverse to your = client. Your statement runs "a kin" to a statement made on this list = sometime ago that "lawyers assess blame". I responded to correct that = statement and pointed out that juries asses blame, not lawyers. =20 So now I have to clear up your incorrect statement. Lawyers do what = clients pay them to do. We are ethically bound to do so unless the = client's request involves illegal activity etc. Lawyers cannot by law, = go and sue people on their own unless personally involved. In fact, the vast majority of lawyers are NOT litigators and have not = and will not ever step foot into a courtroom in their entire career, and = could not sue themselves out of a paper bag. What I find to be most interesting is the "connection" you believe you = had made between the way you been treated by Joe B. and the fact that he = is a lawyer. Is it your position that you would have been treated = differently by Joe if he wasn't a lawyer? It is my understanding that Joe has devoted years of his life to Lancair = now and has not actively practiced in quite a while. I could be wrong = about that but nonetheless, it would not wipe away the nexus you believe = you have uncovered. I have no dog in this fight, and have no interest in what engine you buy = or who you buy it from. To make blanket statements about Joe in your = earlier posts, and now to make blanket statements impuning the integrity = of a truly noble profession is simply not nice. I know your frustrated, = we have ALL been there. Remember people telling you when you were young = that "you get more bees with honey than with vinegar"? Oh, and your statement, ... "sue me if you like" be careful what you = wish for, getting sued is an expensive proposition. NOTE ----- Nothing in this email is to be considered legal advice and is = just the opinion of the author. Craig M .Blitzer Attorney at Law ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C6C68F.6F8F67D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mr. K.

I own a IV-P recip so for me,=20 the emails between you and everyone else = about Walters D,=20 Walters E, Diemetec, flow packs, high frequency etc.., is merely=20 entertainment.

I do however as a lawyer, take personal = issue with=20 your statement that Lawyers sue people to make a living. Lawyers = practice=20 law to make a living and yes, sometimes that involves suing a party = adverse to=20 your client. Your statement runs "a kin" to a statement = made on=20 this list sometime ago that "lawyers assess blame". I responded to = correct=20 that statement and pointed out that juries asses blame,=20 not lawyers.

So now I have to clear up your = incorrect=20 statement. Lawyers do what clients pay them to do. We are = ethically=20 bound to do so unless the client's request involves illegal activity = etc. =20 Lawyers cannot by law, go and sue people on their own unless personally=20 involved.

In fact, the vast majority of lawyers = are NOT=20 litigators and have not and will not ever step foot into a = courtroom in=20 their entire career, and could not sue themselves out of a paper=20 bag.

What I find to be most interesting is=20 the "connection" you believe you had made between the way = you been=20 treated by Joe B. and the fact that he is a lawyer. Is it your = position=20 that you would have been treated differently by Joe if he wasn't a=20 lawyer?

It is my understanding that Joe has = devoted years=20 of his life to Lancair now and has not actively practiced in quite a=20 while. I could be wrong about that but nonetheless, it = would=20 not wipe away the nexus you believe you have = uncovered.

I have no dog in this fight, and have = no interest=20 in what engine you buy or who you buy it from. To make blanket = statements=20 about Joe in your earlier posts, and now to make blanket statements = impuning the=20 integrity of a truly noble profession is simply not nice. I know = your=20 frustrated, we have ALL been there. Remember people telling you = when you=20 were young that "you get more bees with honey than with = vinegar"?

Oh, and your statement, ... "sue = me if you=20 like" be careful what you wish for, getting sued is an=20 expensive proposition.

NOTE ----- Nothing in this = email is to be=20 considered legal advice and is just the opinion of the=20 author.

Craig M .Blitzer

Attorney at Law

------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C6C68F.6F8F67D0--