X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:46:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1339869 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:47:48 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=matt.hapgood@alumni.duke.edu Received: from [65.40.217.234] (helo=bmw.hapgoods.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1GEoZs-0004k2-62 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:47:04 -0400 Received: from HP780N (HP780N.hapgoods.com [192.168.2.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by bmw.hapgoods.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7KEkvS2010196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:47:03 -0400 From: "Matt Hapgood" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy? X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:47:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <008201c6c467$823f4d20$6402a8c0@hapgoods.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-index: AcbEA++TAIX2QMpTQG21lXagGRrUDAAY0iuA In-reply-to: X-ELNK-Trace: b48a86202a850ddb74bf435c0eb9d478e6a9bebd62fba1b09ad54ab45c981091cc2f18ddc3eaefb1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.40.217.234 I switched from a 3-blade MT (mid-90's blade design) to an AeroComposites on my Lancair 360. There must have been something wrong with that MT. I gained a couple of knots in cruise with the Aerocomposite, but more interestingly, my climb was dramatically improved. Matt