X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:11:25 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.137.3] (HELO imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1338646 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:15:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=PJHWFD@aol.com Received: from PJHWFD@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.235.e110c6a (57293) for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:14:57 -0400 (EDT) From: PJHWFD@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <235.e110c6a.32184cb1@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:14:57 EDT Subject: Fwd: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_235.e110c6a.32184cb1_boundary" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5125 X-Spam-Flag: NO --part1_235.e110c6a.32184cb1_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1155986097" -------------------------------1155986097 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------1155986097 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -------------------------------1155986097-- --part1_235.e110c6a.32184cb1_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: From: PJHWFD@aol.com Full-name: PJHWFD Message-ID: <499.7984d2d.321848b5@aol.com> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:57:57 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy? To: colyncase@earthlink.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1155985077" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5125 -------------------------------1155985077 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Colyn These are both 50 ROP numbers which send my CHTs to 370-380 which is higher than I like especially for break in. The 10:1 pistons do give me lower peak egts as predicted. Greyhawk had an excellent point about lower fuel flows and if this does prove to be the case it maybe the silver lining especially LOP. The motor runs very well LOP but I'm still a little unsure of safe power settings with how ever many ponies I am really running. Peter Hebert N23PH LEG2/G pjhwfd@aol.com -------------------------------1155985077 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Colyn

These are both 50 ROP numbers which send my CHTs to 370-380 which is hi= gher than I like especially for break in. The 10:1 pistons do give me=20= lower peak egts as predicted. Greyhawk had an excellent point about lo= wer fuel flows and if this does prove to be the case it maybe the silver lin= ing especially LOP. The motor runs very well LOP but I'm still a littl= e unsure of safe power settings with how ever many ponies I am really runnin= g.

Peter Hebert
N23PH LEG2/G
pjhwfd@aol.com

-------------------------------1155985077-- --part1_235.e110c6a.32184cb1_boundary--