X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:28:07 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1337485@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <lancair@USTEK.COM>
Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3)
  with ESMTP id 1337005 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:40:34 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=lancair@USTEK.COM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6C2CC.02D53262"
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy?
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:41:30 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
X-Original-Message-ID: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C274510483B7@server1.USTEK>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C274510483B7@server1.USTEK>
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy?
Thread-Index: AcbCqGqmuGWeX248RVigglDL40ttpAAIot+b
References: <list-1336736@logan.com>
From: "Lancair" <lancair@USTEK.COM>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>