Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:24:31 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1337458@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.82.227; envelope-from=akadamson@gmail.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index:in-reply-to:sender;
        b=rvgydVXoOtd1Q7ms+Hm6c96SPurjZYxlguMPqgRXXtrg0H7Wh7x9AI/zZ2q1OfWiYiyqjZYR7zNaCKfV7N4z4eES7DkfEh/j/WL60Xv4VeRsMwkKpE4NUKkuRGqIzEguuKu2OL8EeesHMoJcrhiY/51o6jLE4W3yit1j3/X4pIQ=
From: "Alan K. Adamson" <aadamson@highrf.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcbCqC4UCqIeeQkPSj+6A7b8E4JHEgAF/PIA
In-Reply-To: <list-1336736@logan.com>

Tim,

Thanks for the response... I agree and have seen first hand the "swap" with
199L.  However, I was under the impression (perhaps wrongfully), that Dave
used an American Propeller, or Aero Composites, and not an MT?  If Dave's is
truly a MT, that makes the decision a very easy one :)..

Thanks for the feedback.  I'll drop Dave an email and ask as well.

Alan
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Timothy Ong
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:25 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy?

Alan,

I have had this discussions many times.  Check out the Reno race results for
the last two years.  Pay particular attention to Dave Morss's times.  He
used an MT propeller for all of the racing except the last day.  There is 10
mph difference in his average speeds when he used Lancair's Hartzell
propeller off of N199L.

There is no better propeller for the engine no matter what the weight
advantage.

Regards,

Timothy Ong


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/